wrote recently about how his note-taking system is helping him formulate new ideas and create articles. It gave me pause to reflect on my own note-taking system, and I realised it hasn’t as of yet led to me writing any articles.

First reflection: I’m not actually too bothered by that, right now. It is not really currently a firm goal of mine to write articles. I don’t have a thesis that I have a burning desire to push, and I don’t have a target of writing for the sake of it, either. So that is most likely the biggest reason. (That said, why am I taking notes if I don’t plan to do anything with them…?) An action point: reflect if regular article writing is a goal.

There’s some practical things I could do, if I did want to write more long-form.

I’m currently falling in to the collector’s fallacy a little bit, I think. Perhaps just thinking about my wiki as a , as I sort of do, points me in that direction.

A tiny adjustment I have started to make, is the naming of my notes. Prefer note titles with complete phrases to sharpen claims. I’ve noticed that this does make me think more about notions, as Ton called them, not just copied notes.

I could also try to aim for a more formal knowledge cycle (research, read, take note, write). I kind of do this anyway, but it’s a little ad-hoc.

Lastly, I’d like to revisit ““. I think I’m more motivated to write something more considered and longer when in response to reading something from a friend. It would be fun to start some open chains.

Replied to Two Effects From Notetaking by Ton Zijlstra (zylstra.org)

Both those effects, new things rising because of writing about existing ones, and spending time thinking to be able to create, are most welcome ones.

Great to hear! It’s nice to hear about your note notion-taking system leading to a long-form post. I haven’t written a very long post from my notes yet – I think I’ll have a reflect as to why that is.

I read about a third of The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet a while back, then got into reading non-fiction at night. But now I’m back on fiction at night again (seems to correlate with being back at work?)

I’ve gotten back in to this pretty quickly – I really like it. It’s quite different to a lot of sci-fi – it’s much more relationship based, less action heavy. It’s quite gentle and gently-paced, so far at least, but by no means twee, and quite reflective on some of the oddities and indeed darker aspects of human nature. You get to know the characters and their feelings but the plot keeps you ticking along at the same time.

(This is another book I came across via Ton’s bookshelf – very handy and simple, to find book suggestions from friends’ reading lists!)

The World Wide Web was all about you create knowledge and how you create hyperlinks to different pieces of knowledge. So over time we kind of create this tapestry of humanity and what we know, which at another level of abstraction is kind of creating this meta-map of humanity. This meta-map of humanity is now controlled by these companies that are the ones who have access to the backend.

The Global South Holds a Better Future of Tech w/ Juan Ortiz Freuler

I love the phrase tapestry of humanity here. I like the and as a way of being part of the warp and weft of that tapestry.

I really enjoyed the latest episode of Tech Won’t Save Us, on a successful community action in Melbourne to stop Apple plonking an Apple store in their public square. It’s less about digital transgressions, more about the use of public space in the physical world, an interesting change and a reminder that the big tech firms have global physical presence too.

https://www.buzzsprout.com/1004689/4872008-how-to-defeat-an-apple-store-w-tania-davidge