Really enjoyed reading @ntnsndr’s article [[Governable Stacks against Digital Colonialism]] for [[node club]]. Makes a ton of sense to me.

The ability to self-govern feels key to any alternative to big tech that we build or use, and feels a lot like commoning.

And the ‘stack’ element is vital – what use would a democratically-owned social media platform be, say, if it runs on a server owned by Amazon and you access it on a device locked down by Apple or Google over internet from a big telco.

Been reading [[Against Digital Colonialism]] for [[node club]].

It’s a great article.

"With almost half of humanity without access to basic forms of connectivity and entire countries with a pending digitisation process, new patterns of domination have just begun to emerge. This paper identifies these problems and suggests a technical and regulatory path to neutralise and reverse them in order to secure a future of digital autonomy, democracy, sovereignty and dignity."

Not only is vaccine inequity abhorrent, without vaccine equity we are perpetuating a global health risk.

The best way to improve access is enabling the local means of production of vaccines. That is prevented at the moment by patents and blocked technology transfer.

Basically a lack of knowledge sharing due to profit motives is killing people.

I’ve been reading [[Platform Socialism]] for node club this week. (Only 3 chapters so far though)

It has a preference for social ownership and community governance of platforms and infrastructure rather than antitrust etc, kind of reminded me of @ntnsndr governable stacks.

Looks like it gets into proper nitty gritty proposals for alternatives later, and mentions Fediverse, should be good.