The best way to improve access is enabling the local means of production of vaccines. That is prevented at the moment by patents and blocked technology transfer.
Basically a lack of knowledge sharing due to profit motives is killing people.
It has a preference for social ownership and community governance of platforms and infrastructure rather than antitrust etc, kind of reminded me of @ntnsndr governable stacks.
Looks like it gets into proper nitty gritty proposals for alternatives later, and mentions Fediverse, should be good.
* Agroecology helps humanity relink itself with nature
* Agroecology rebuts the predatory logic of nature’s use as a commodity and production resource
* Agroecology is not just alternative to green capitalism, but an alternative to capitalism itself
* Agroecology is what allows movements of struggle for land to exist
* Any serious struggle movement must have agroecology as its mode of production
This week I took a little look at [[Agroecology]]. Some notes from [[Jayu]] on it helped me to form an initial gut feeling that [[I like agroecology]].
e.g. if I think of the [[Agora]] / [[FedWiki]] and [[Wikipedia]] contrast, and the claim that [[Multiple voices are better than one]], then I think that multiple voices is more variety, and then more able to provide the variety needed to adequately navigate complex questions of coordination. And the flattening of voices in to one is an unhelpful reduction of variety.
On the flip side, too much variety leads to a [[cacophony of voices]].
I can not claim to know enough about either space to know if this is bollocks or not. Gut says worth exploring.
* Saw a red squirrel running along a fallen tree.
* Saw a buzzard across the lake with the binoculars that wouldn’t have been able to perceive otherwise.
* Saw lovely patterning of the underside of buzzards’ wings as they hovered high above.